Monday, April 18, 2016

Pekerja Megasteel - Adakah MP, ADUN dan Kerajaan Negeri Selangor Ada Cadangan Penyelesaian? Atau kena minta Najib tolong?


Masalah kehilangan pekerjaan dan masalah pekerja di Megasteel - yang harus difahami adalah bahawa ini berlaku di Selangor, negeri di bawah pentadbiran kerajaan Pembangkang, di mana Menteri Besar adalah daripada Parti Keadilan Rakyat(PKR)...
 
KERAJAAN NEGERI SELANGOR - PRIHATIN ATAU TAK PRIHATIN?
 
Apakah tindakan kerajaan negeri? Apakah penyelesaian yang dicadangkan oleh kerajaan negeri? Adakah Azmin Ali atau kerajaan Negeri melakukan apa-apa sehingga ini? [Carian 'Google' untuk "Megasteel Azmin Ali' tidak mendedahkan apa-apa berita - Azmin Ali tak memberi komen apa-apa mengenai nasib pekerja Megasteel?] Apakah perancangan jangka pendek kerajaan negeri? Adakah kerajaan negeri akan membantu mencari kerja baru? Adakah kerajaan negeri akan menyediakan 'bantuan kewangan' membantu pekerja dan keluarga pekerja - mungkin, boleh disediakan bantuan kewangan sementara sebanyak RM1,000 untuk jangkamasa 6 bulan atau sehingga pekerja dapat mencari pekerjaan baru?   

Jika sebuah syarikat mahu beroperasi di Selangor, mesti ada kebenaran kerajaan negeri Selangor. Adakah Selangor mengenakan syarat 'majikan perlu hormati hak pekerja dan kesatuan'? Adakah Selangor memerlukan majikan kilang memaklumkan awal kepada pihak kerajaan jika akan berlaku penutupan kilang atau pembuangan kerja beramai-ramai - supaya kerajaan Selangor boleh awal lagi berusaha menangani masalah yang bakal akan dialami pekerja di dalam Negeri Selangor? Banyak yang boleh dilakukan kerajaan negeri....untuk menjaga hak dan kebajikan pekerja...tetapi adakah Menteri Besar Azmin Ali prihatin mengenai perkara remeh saperti masalah pekerja dan keluarga?
 
AHLI PARLIMEN & ADUN? 
 
Abdullah Sani adalah Ahli Parlimen Kuala Langat - hebat kerana beliau juga seorang 'Unionist' - beliau juga Acting Presiden MTUC. Beliau semestinya prihatin mengenai isu pekerja dan masalah pekerja di Megasteel... Tapi sehingga kini, beliau tidak pun mengeluarkan apa-apa kenyataan media mengenai isu di Megasteel... MTUC juga belum keluarkan apa-apa kenyataan media mengenai isu di Megasteel.
 
Lapuran berita Star menyatakan bahawa beliau menganggap apa yang berlaku itu 'cruel'. Beliau nampaknya telah kemudian mengadakan perbincangan dengan pihak Megasteel, Pengarah Jabatan Buruh - tapi ini lapuran media 18/4/2016 - bukankah semua ini sudah lewat? Apa yang dibincangkan pun tak dilapurkan? Apa cadangan penyelesaian beliau juga tak dinyatakan? Apakah yang dia mahu pun tidak dinyatakan? 
 
Malaysiakini(18/4/2016) melapurkan yang  Abdullah Sani akan bercakap dengan Najib Tun Razak mengenai perkara ini. Bukan sahaja lewat bertindak dalam isu ini yang telah mendapatkan liputan media lebih kurang 1 minggu, adalah anih Abdullah Sani nak pi cakap dengan PM - apakah pendirian atau cadangan Abdullah Sani....atau adakah dia akan pergi beritahu sahaja masalah kepada PM. Bilakah ini akan berlaku? Adakah PM akan memberi masa untuk jumpa dengan MP Abdullah Sani? Abdullah Sani harus mempunyai TUNTUTAN ATAU CADANGAN WAJAR - bukan hanya menyampaikan berita dan minta PM dan Kerajaan BN untuk selesai isu ini. PM dan kerajaan BN pun baca surat khabar - dan jangan lupa bahawa Kementerian Sumber Manusia, adalah kerajaan dan sudah pasti PM sudah tahu...
“Since these are serious issues, I will speak to the prime minister about this,” said Abdullah Sani.
Kenapa Abdullah Sani tak mahu pi jumpa dengan Azmin Ali, Menteri Besar Selangor...? ADUN kawasan nampaknya tak keluarpun...atau mereka ada keluar berjumpa mangsa tetapi tidak dilapurkan media. Tapi, jika tak dilapurkan media, pasti maklumat dan pandangan mereka akan keluar dalam Blog atau Laman Web mereka...
 
MASALAH kita tahu tetapi apakah cadangan penyelesaian masalah - MP dan ADUN perlu memberikan cadangan penyelesaian atau tuntutan jelas... kalau tidak mampu, dan hanya berupaya hantar berita sahaja ...lebih baik, jangan jadi 'wakil rakyat'...
 
 
 
 
Monday, 18 April 2016 | MYT 5:56 PM

Execs steel for hard times after sudden termination

KUALA LANGAT: A group of executives were left in the lurch after their services were terminated with less than 24 hours' notice by Megasteel Sdn Bhd and Lion DRI Sdn Bhd.

Jamilah Abdul Rahman, 34, a senior executive at Lion DRI’s quality assurance department, said it is untimely for the company to stop her service now that she is 34 weeks' pregnant with her second child.

“I have been working for them for 10 years and started as an executive.

“The extremely short notice was a rude shock to many of us. I am worried about what happens next, especially because I am expecting a baby soon.

“I can only start looking for another job after my confinement," she said at a protest staged outside Wisma Lion in Banting, near here, on Monday.

The protest saw more than 200 workers holding placards and banners and chanting slogans, expressing their worries and demanding for proper compensation for their retrenchment.

Jamilah, from Olak Rempit, here, said she initially heard about possible lay-offs for the executives from a meeting in February.

“However, a memo was issued later saying that all executives would be terminated, while non-executives would be laid off, without stating any time frame.

"Now, we have been suddenly given termination notices.

"It gives us no time to make preparations," she said, adding that it is going to be a challenge to look for a job with the current economy outlook.

Mechanical executive Raja Badrulizamman Raja Mad Nasir, 35, said it is unfair for Megasteel to give such a short notice to terminate some 90 executives who have served for five years and more citing significant deterioration of business performance and environment.

"The sudden termination has made things difficult for us, who mostly have families to provide for.

"It is also unfair to give out the three-month payment in lieu of termination notice in instalments," he said, adding that they had yet to receive their March salaries.

Production executive Norzaidi Nekmat, 34, questioned why contract staff and foreign workers still have jobs in the companies.

"This is unfair. The management should have discussed its problems with us.

"I have no choice but to rely on my savings and my wife to support the family temporarily," said the father of two.

Kuala Langat MP Abdullah Sani Abdul Hamid, who is also MTUC acting president, described the action of the companies as ''cruel''.

He said the companies should not have terminated the workers on such short notice and no room for further discussions.

"Apart from being unfair, this is also a violation of labour laws.

Abdullah Sani later held talks the management of the companies together with other representatives, including Selangor Labour Department director Mohd Asri Abdul Wahab. - Star, 18/4/2016


Arah berhenti 24 jam

Ekhwan Haque Fazlul Haque

ekhwan@hmetro.com.my

Kuala Langat: “Kami berharap ada unsur simpati terhadap nasib kami. Ada antara kami sudah bekerja sejak 33 tahun lalu,” kata Raja Badrul Izaman Raja Mad Nasir, 35.

Dia antara lebih 100 pekerja eksekutif Megasteel di Olak Lempit di sini, yang masih ‘terumbang-ambing’ berikutan tindakan syarikat berkenaan memberhentikan pekerja dengan memberi notis 24 jam pada 31 Mac lalu.

Selain itu lebih 400 pekerja bukan eksekutif kilang itu kini diarahkan bercuti tanpa sebarang kata putus berhubung masa depan mereka.

Raja Badrul Izaman berkata, tindakan majikan mereka dianggap tidak wajar berikutan kesukaran pekerja mendapatkan pekerja lain bagi menampung kehidupan.

“Pekerja tiada pilihan kerana kami seakan dipaksa berhenti walaupun tidak menandatangani sebarang dokumen persetujuan yang diberikan pihak pengurusan pada petang 31 Mac lalu.

Dapatkan akhbar Harian Metro untuk berita selanjutnya.
Artikel ini disiarkan pada : Selasa, 19 April 2016 @ 6:33 AM



DUA ribu pekerja membuat demonstrasi dan membawa sepanduk selepas diberhentikan kerja tanpa mendapat pampasan di hadapan Wisma Lion Megasteel kawasan Perindustrian Olak Lempit.
- See more at: http://www.hmetro.com.my/node/131622#sthash.F84EN3sN.dpuf

Source: My Metro, 19/4/2016

"Gaji RM1,800 dipotong lagi separuh, anak bini nak makan apa?"

11 April 2016 Luqman Hariz, Astro Awani
Beberapa pekerja yang diberhentikan kerja mengadakan piket di hadapan kilang Megasteel hari ini. - Gambar Astro AWANI
Beberapa pekerja yang diberhentikan kerja mengadakan piket di hadapan kilang Megasteel hari ini. – Gambar Astro AWANI

BANTING: “Gaji RM1,800 dipotong lagi separuh, anak bini nak makan apa?”

Demikian ujar Mohd Amir Rapini, salah seorang dari 489 pekerja yang diberhentikan kerja buat sementara waktu dari kilang keluli Megasteel Sdn Bhd.

Keluhan Amir disambut teriakan kira-kira 60 pekerja yang mengadakan piket di pintu hadapan Megasteel hari ini.

Sebagai sebahagian daripada langkah lay-off ini, kesemua mereka dipotong gaji 50 peratus.

“Mereka zalim. Saya sudah berbelas tahun di sini. Saya ada tiga orang anak, semuanya bersekolah lagi,” tambahnya.

Sebahagian daripada pekerja yang mengadakn protes di hadapan kilang Megasteel di Banting hari ini. - Gambar Astro AWANI
Sebahagian daripada pekerja yang mengadakn protes di hadapan kilang Megasteel di Banting hari ini. – Gambar Astro AWANI

Megasteel Sdn Bhd hanya salah satu mangsa kejatuhan industri keluli tempatan akibat penurunan ringgit dan kegiatan lambakan keluli dari China.

Pengeluar tempatan kini berdepan persaingan sengit ekoran harga keluli dari China yang rendah dan peningkatan kos operasi.

“Pengeluar keluli tempatan terjejas teruk dengan aktiviti import lambakan keluli dengan harga murah sejak beberapa tahun lalu,” kata Megasteel dalam satu kenyataan hari ini.

Megasteel berkata, kini kapasiti pengeluarannya hanya digunakan 20 ke 30 peratus.

Ia turut menyaksikan kerugian RM2 bilion pada 2014 dan paras terkini pinjaman banknya melebihi RM12 bilion.

Sebahagian daripada pekerja yang mengadakn protes di hadapan kilang Megasteel di Banting hari ini. - Gambar Astro AWANI
Sebahagian daripada pekerja yang mengadakn protes di hadapan kilang Megasteel di Banting hari ini. – Gambar Astro AWANI

“Kami sedih kerana terpaksa melakukannya (pemberhentian kerja sementara). Kalau kami boleh elakkan, kami akan elakkan,” kata Vasu Palanisamy, Pengurus Kanan Perhubungan Pekerja Lion Group, syarikat induk Megasteel.

Tambahnya: “Kita mengharap keajaiban, agar industri keluli tempatan pulih kembali dan kita boleh sambung kerja seperti biasa.”

Sumber: Astro AWANI

Monday, 18 April 2016 | MYT 6:50 PM

Megasteel: Workers were briefed on business challenges


In a statement Monday, Megasteel said it organised several town hall sessions with employees to brief and engage them on the business challenges and unavoidable decision to lay off and retrench workers.

"We are also providing support and training for the employees to seek alternate employment.

"Megasteel also sought the assistance of the Labour Department and other companies for job placement of its employees," it said.

Megasteel said it also noted the discouraging job market, with other industries also affected by poor sales and low production levels.

"We have and will continue to engage with all stakeholders and the relevant authorities to try and address the unavoidable issue of layoffs and retrenchment considering the present difficult business environment," it said.

Megasteel also said that it is in constant consultations with the authorities, such as the Labour Department, the Industrial Relations Department and the Metal Industry Employees Union (MIEU), to seek an amicable solution to the workers' plight and concerns.

It noted that local steel manufacturers have been badly affected by rampant imports at dumped prices in the past several years.

"This has resulted in low orders and low capacity utilisation, with the major steel mills incurring heavy losses of more than RM2bil in 2014 and bank borrowings in excess of RM12bil.

"Many steel manufacturers have closed down and the rest, including Megasteel, are running their operations intermittently, leading to many employees being laid off or retrenched."

Megasteel said it has provided information on the layoffs and retrenchment to the International Trade and Industry Ministry and Mida as requested, with the Government aware of the developments affecting the steel industry.

It said that the company and steel associations had requested the authorities to act against excessive imports and save the local industry, which employs some 150,000 workers, many of whom are highly skilled and experienced.

"The local steel industry have made numerous presentations to the authorities to act against foreign manufacturers dumping state-subsidised steel products.

''Regrettably, Megasteel’s submission for safeguard petition was terminated by the Government and the anti-dumping duties imposed were not effective in curbing dumping.

''We urge the Government to assist the local steel industry and the employees whose jobs are at stake, by taking the necessary and urgent actions to curb dumping and dubious imports of steel products," it added. - Star, 18/4/2016
 

MP to consult Najib, seeks ‘win-win’ for steelmaker, workers


Terence Tang     Published     Updated     0 comments
Kuala Langat MP Abdullah Sani Abdul Hamid, will bring up the issues afflicting steelmaker Megasteel Sdn Bhd and their employees with Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak.

The PKR rep was present at today’s discussion – held between representatives of Megasteel, Jabatan Tenaga Kerja, Metal Industry Employees’ Union and the workers' committee.

“Since these are serious issues, I will speak to the prime minister about this,” said Abdullah Sani.

The meeting took place after a second picket by laid-off employees in front of Megasteel’s office in Banting.

“We (Megasteel) would really appreciate it if the YB can bring this matter up with the prime minister and in Parliament, and help influence a decision in favour of the company,” said Vasu Palanisamy, the senior manager group industrial relations and employee relations (Irer) of Megasteel.

Vasu added that the workers’ committee representatives also enquired about when the company can come back with a response to their issues.

“Unfortunately, I was unable to give a definite date.

“The company management is discussing this matter and we will get back to the representatives as soon as possible,” Vasu added.

According to The Star report on Nov 25, Megasteel had petitioned the government to curb the rampant imports of hot rolled coil (HRC) at dumping prices.

Megasteel said in a statement that it had the right to seek trade remedy measures against HRC imports which were “causing serious injury to the local HRC industry in Malaysia.”

“The petition seeks to provide an equitable and level playing field for the local producers of HRC in the country,” the company added.

Laid-off employees hopeful

Meanwhile, workers’ committee secretary Elangovan Manaisamy said the affected employees did not want to be laid off and preferred compensation, so they would be able to seek employment with other companies.

“By being laid off, we are only being paid 50 percent of our salary monthly. And the company had also said we can’t work at other places during the layoff,” Elangovan claimed.

Elangovan added that the affected employees will hold another picket if Megasteel does not responded to their issues before April 30.

With regards to Kuala Langat parliamentarian Abdullah Sani offering to help both parties involved, Elangovan is grateful the MP has pledged to look into the issue.

“We are also hoping to amicably resolve this issue. Let this be a win-win situation for both Megasteel and the affected employees,” he added.

Today’s picket, organised a week after the first one, was attended by an estimated 280 people. _ Malaysiakini, 18/4/2016
 
 

Sunday, April 17, 2016

Untuk Berjuang Tak Perlu Tunggu Pengiktirafan Majikan Untuk Kesatuan? Pekerja Bersatu sudah cukup...

Pekerja bersatu dan berjuang untuk hak pekerja dan hak kesatuan. Perjuangan ini juga adalah untuk mempertahankan hak pekerja sedia ada - serta menangkis apa-apa tindakan salah dan/atau tidak adil yang dilakukan terhadap mana-mana pekerja. Jika satu pekerja ditindas, sila ketahui bahawa kami, semua pekerja akan bersatu dan berjuang tanpa takut sedia menghadapi apa-apa risiko.

Pengiktirafan - ini sama sekali tidak harus menjadi penghalang kepada kesatuan sekerja dan perjuangan demi keadilan. Sama ada majikan mengiktiraf atau tidak kesatuan sekerja, ini tidak harus menjadi penghalang kepada perjuangan pekerja.

Malangnya, kini 'pengiktirafan majikan' digunakan setengah kesatuan sekerja sebagai alasan tidak aktif sebagai kesatuan dan tidak mahu berjuang bersungguh-sungguh. 

Ada kesatuan juga membuat keputusan sendiri tidak mahu mengutip yuran kesatuan setiap bulan, sehingga pengiktirafan majikan diperolehi - sebenarnya sehingga perjanjian bersama(Collective Bargaining Agreement) dibuat dan mula berkuatkuasa. Tanpa dana, sememangnya kesatuan akan lemah dan keupayaan melakukan aktiviti kurang...

MENGAPA?

MALAS KUTIP YURAN TERUS DARIPADA AHLI, DAN AHLI MALAS BUAT BAYARAN BULANAN KEPADA UNION?

Kerana biasanya bila sudah ada pengiktirafan(recognition) dan perjanjian bersama, ada persetujuan dimana majikan akan terus memotong dari gaji ahli kesatuan yuran kesatuan, dan salurkan kepada kesatuan. Justeru, pungutan yuran kesatuan menjadi lebih mudah - tak perlu kesatuan sendiri pergi sendiri mengutip yuran bulanan pekerja... Bukankah ini 'malas' - dan pendekatan sebegini menyebabkan kesatuan bergantung sangat kepada majikan untuk mengutip yuran... Ini juga merbahaya, sebab majikan mempunyai kuasa besar untuk 'union busting' - majikan boleh terus potong pengaliran wang daripada ahli kesatuan kepada kesatuan > dan ini boleh melemahkan azam dan keupayaan perjuangan kesatuan. Ugutan berhenti mengutip yuran kesatuan dan menyalurkan kepada kesatuan adalah alat yang boleh digunakan majikan...dan pernah juga dilakukan di Malaysia sebelum ini.

Kesatuan Sekerja harus terus memungut yuran daripada ahli - di mana, ahli kesatuan juga mesti sedia membuat bayaran yuran bulan-bulan terus kepada kesatuan. Kini, ada juga banyak cara, di mana jika ahli memberikan arahan kepada bank - bank juga sedia membuat potongan bulanan dan salurkan kepada akaun kesatuan... 

PENDEKATAN TAK ADA PERJANJIAN BERSAMA YANG MEMBERIKAN HAK LEBIH, AHLI KESATUAN TAK MAHU BAYAR YURAN BULANAN KEPADA KESATUAN. MENGAPA BAYAR JIKA TAK DAPAT KEUNTUNGAN?

Tak ada untung, tak mahu bayar - ini sikap salah. Ini bukan sikap berkesatuan sebenar - kerana matlamat utama adalah 'pekerja bersatu' - pekerja kuat - akan bersatu menghadapi apa-apa penindasan, akan bersatu berjuang menentang apa-apa ketidakadilan walaupun kesatuan masih belum diiktiraf majikan ...walaupun tidak ada perjanjian bersama. Yang menyedihkan adalah pendekatan ini bukan sahaja pendekatan ahli tetapi juga kepimpinan...

Sebenarnya pengiktirafan majikan adalah perkara kecil - sama ada majikan iktiraf atau tidak, pekerja bersatu boleh berjuang demi kepentingan pekerja...

PEKERJA TAKUT JADI AHLI KESATUAN SEHINGGA KESATUAN DIIKTIRAF MAJIKAN?  
Adakah ini benar? Pekerja sedemikian yang mahu 'kebenaran majikan' sudah kalah dalam perjuangan... Jika sifat begini, lebih baik tak perlu kesatuan?

Jika majikan mendiskriminasi mana-mana pekerja kerana menjadi kesatuan, ini tidak dibenarkan undang-undang negara tak kira sama ada kesatuan sudah diiktiraf atau tidak. 

PENGIKTIRAFAN MAJIKAN  - ini adalah satu keperluan bertujuan membenteras perjuangan pekerja dan kesatuan, yang sedih sekali diiktiraf kerajaan.

PENGIKTIRAFAN MAJIKAN - jika, dilihat undang-undang sedia ada, ia hanya diperlukan sebagai pra-syarat untuk mendapatkan Perjanjian Bersama...justeru, tak ada apa-apa yang menghalang kesatuan aktif membuat semua perkara lain untuk memperjuangkan hak dan nasib pekerja...

JIKA TIDAK ADA PENGIKTIRAFAN, APAKAH YANG BOLEH DILAKUKAN KESATUAN?
Hampir semua perkara yang Kesatuan atau pekerja bersolidariti boleh lakukan...

* Aktiviti memperkasakan kesatuan dan kemampuan ahli

> Aktiviti menambahkan 'solidariti' antara ahli

* Perjumpaan kerap boleh diadakan - di mana ahli boleh berkongsi pendapat, meluangkan perasaan, mungkin juga membuat perancangan bagaimana boleh menuntut hak tambahan...

* Harus disedari yang mereka yang merupakan kawan karib akan lebih sedia keluar berjuang bersama apa hak anda dicabuli - berbanding dengan kawan biasa - berbanding dengan kenalan biasa - berbanding dengan 'ahli sekesatuan' saja.. Justeru, untuk memguatkan kesatuan, proses menambahkan keeratan perhubungan manusia adalah sangat penting... Kini, banyak kesatuan yang lama sudah wujud pun tidak mempunyai mengerakkan semua ahli mereka untuk bertindak - lihat piket yang dianjurkan kesatuan, peratusan ahli yang terlibat tersangat rendah...
> Aktiviti menambahkan pengetahuan ahli mengenai hak, mengenai cara menuntut hak,...

Ramai pekerja tidak tahu hak mereka dalam undang-undang & apa yang mereka boleh membuat jika hak mereka dinafikan..

Hak Pekerja sedia wujud dalam undang-undang, serta dalam Kontrak Pekerjaan Mereka..{Perjanjian Bersama hanya menambahkan sedikit hak pekerja ini, dan selain daripada Perjanjian Bersama, majikan juga boleh ditekan memberikan hak lebih > apa majikan mahu membuat jika kesemua atau majoriti pekerja mereka mahukan sesuatu hak lebih?

* Tak ada kesatuan pun, pekerja sendiri boleh membuat aduan dan tuntutan... jika ada kesatuan, boleh juga mendapatkan bantuan kesatuan dan ahli kesatuan lain..

* Kesatuan boleh menganjurkan program pendidikan pekerja...memperkasakan ahli dengan pengetahuan tambahan mengenai hak, dan cara membuat aduan/tuntutan...Lagi ramai ahli tahu hak...lebih kuat dan 'berkualiti' kesatuan sekerja..

* Kesatuan juga boleh menganjurkan program bagaimana menghadapi tindakan disiplin - bagaimana menjawab surat tunjuk sebab, bagaimana membela pekerja lain dalam Siasatan Dalaman(Domestic Inquiry),..
 
[*Malangnya, ada setengah kepimpinan kesatuan tidak berminat sangat berkongsi pengetahuan - mereka tidak mahu ahli jadi 'pandai' - mereka mahu ahli terus bergantung kepada kepimpinan mengenai nasihat/bantuan berkaitan hak...sedih sekali. Ada juga ramai pekerja, tak berminat 'sediakan payung sebelum hujan', bila sendiri jadi mangsa, baru mahu cari 'payung']

> Aktiviti menuntut hak lebih untuk pekerja 

Jika pekerja bersatu menuntut hak tambahan, majikan sukar menafikan. Ya, kuasa 'pekerja bersatu' adalah apa yang berkuasa - union atau kesatuan sekerja adalah nama formal gerakkan 'pekerja bersatu'... 

Baru ini, di satu kilang yang tak ada kesatuan, pekerja bersatu telah menghantar surat menuntut bahawa majikan harus membayar lebih caruman KWSP, di mana mereka telah berjaya..

Jika ada pencabulan hak di tempat kerja, kesatuan yang tak beriktiraf juga boleh memaklumkan kepada Jabatan Perhubungan Manusia(Jabatan Buruh), yang akan memaksa pihak berkuatkuasa menyiasat dan ambil tindakan wajar memastikan pencabulan itu berhenti...

DANA - ini alasan banyak kesatuan mengapa mereka tidak melakukan lebih aktiviti tapi saya percaya ahli pasti sedia mengeluarkan duit perlu jika diminta... dan banyak perkara boleh dilakukan jika pun tak ada dana. Nak tempat untuk adakan mesyuarat dan keramaian, banyak tempat boleh diperolehi dengan percuma atau dengan bayaran minima - Kesatuan lain dan pertubuhan lain sanggup pinjam tempat mereka. Surau juga sedia memberikan tempat...Hanya usaha sedikit diperlukan. Kerajaan juga mungkin sedia memberikan ruang di Dewan Orang Ramai - di mana sewa dewan ini juga rendah, beberapa ratus ringgit sahaja - lebih kurang RM200-300 jika disewa. 

Jika ada 100 ahli, dan setiap sedia beri RM10, jumlahnya RM1,000. Jika sanggup beri RM50, jumlahnya RM5,000. Jika RM100, jumlahnya RM10,000. Untuk tujuan perjuangan, mesti ada kesanggupan berkorban masa, usaha dan juga dana..

Jika ada 1,000 ahli, dan setiap satu sanggup keluarkan RM100, ini bererti dapat RM100,000, Jika RM300, rumah pun boleh dibeli...

SEMANGAT PERJUANGAN MEMERLUKAN PENGORBANAN...

  
 
 


Monday, April 4, 2016

NUFAM masih tidak diiktiraf oleh MAB - Kenapa Malaysia Airlines main tarik tali?

Kenapa Malaysia Airlines main tarik tali?

Korporat
1 of 1
Ismail Nasarudin
Ismail Nasarudin
 
Malaysia Airlines Berhad (MAB) didakwa sengaja tarik tali berhubung surat tuntutan pengiktirafan Kesatuan Kebangsaan Anak-Anak Kapal Kabin Malaysia (Nufam) sebagai wakil kesatuan bagi mewakili anak-anak kapal syarikat penerbangan itu.

Nufam mendakwa pihaknya sudah mengemukakan dua kali Borang 9A kepada MAS tetapi syarikat itu memberitahu surat pertama tidak ditemui dan surat kedua pula salah alamat.

Presiden Nufam, Ismail Nasaruddin berkata, surat ketiga sudah diserahkan dengan menggunakan alamat pejabat MAB di Sepang tetapi sehingga hari ini tidak ada jawapan daripada MAB.

"Kenapa MAB tidak mahu mengiktiraf Nufam sedangkan Nufam adalah kesatuan yang diiktiraf oleh Kementerian Sumber Manusia. Kenapa mengambil masa dua hingga tiga bulan untuk menyerahkan semula borang itu sedangkan proses itu tidak rumit," katanya kepada MalaysiaGazette.

Menurut Ismail, Nufam perlu mendapatkan pengiktirafan MAB kerana ia adalah entiti baru, jadi segala proses perlu dilakukan semula.

Dakwa beliau, Majlis Jawatankuasa Pekerja yang ditubuhkan oleh MAB sengaja mengaburi kakitangan kerana majlis itu tidak mempunyai polisi yang boleh menentukan hak dan suara sebagai sebuah kesatuan pekerja.

"Majlis ini tidak berfungsi seandainya berlaku sesuatu kepada anak-anak kapal? Kalau ada pembuangan pekerja lagi selepas ini, apa jadi dengan nasib mereka? Majlis ini tidak ada locus standi," tambahnya.

Sikap acuh tak acuh MAB ini seolah-olah mahu mengelak keperluan-keperluan yang ditentukan oleh undang-undang dan perhubungan industri yang memberi kuasa kepada kesatuan pekerja untuk bersuara.

"Ketika negara mahu melaksanakan Perjanjian Perkongsian Trans-Pasifik, kerajaan menguar-uarkan antara lain tentang kelebihannya hak dan suara pekerja.

"Soalnya kenapa pula MAB seolah-olah menongkah arus?," ujarnya. - MalaysiaGazette

Friday, April 1, 2016

Adakah Wakil Pekerja dalam Lembaga Pengarah PERKESO, KWSP menderhaka kepada BOS (iaitu pekerja dan Union)?

Mengapa tidak ada wakil pekerja dalam Lembaga Pengarah Pertubuhan Keselamatan Sosial (PERKESO)? 

Nyata ada 4 Pengarah Wakil Majikan....dan sepatutnya ada juga wakil pekerja - kini, jika dilihat senarai Ahli Mewakili Orang Yang Berinsurans, ini merupakan wakil pekerja dan jelas nama Setiausaha MTUC  kini ada dalam senarai tersebut... TETAPI jika ada 'wakil majikan', mesti juga ada kategori 'Wakil Pekerja' ...termasuk juga kategori 'wakil orang yang berinsurans'. Wakil Pekerja perlu kerana ramai pekerja pun kini tidak dibawah skim PERKESO - dan MTUC sebenarnya adalah wakil semua pekerja di Malaysia termasuk juga pekerja kerja sendiri, pekerja tak berunion, dsb... Wakil Pekerja ada tugas mungkin untuk cuba memastikan bahawa semua kategori pekerja diletakkan di bawah skim PERKESO...Kini berapa bilangan tenaga pekerja di Malaysia - apakah bilangan pekerja yang dibawah skim PERKESO - berapa pekerja yang kini tidak di bawah apa-apa 'sosial security scheme'?

Kalau dalam Lembaga Pengarah, jelas MTUC, Union ahli dan pekerja sudah tahu dari awal apa-apa pindaan Akta yang akan berlaku...TETAPI mengapakah maklumat (amaran sesuatu yang tidak bagus kepada pekerja) tidak dimaklumkan terdahu oleh mereka yang menjadi ahli badan pengarah mewakili pekerja...

Adakah wakil pekerja dalam Lembaga Pengarah PERKESO (atau KWSP) memberikan lapuran berkala kepada MTUC mengenai apa yang sedang diperbincangkan atau perkembangan baru dalam PERKESO atau KWSP...Mungkin bagi MTUC, pada setiap mesyuarat Majlis Am (atau Exco/Majlis Tertinggi) lapuran harus diberikan oleh mereka yang menjadi wakil pekerja...

Adakah  Agenda MTUC, sebagai contoh, ada perkara -'Lapuran Wakil Pekerja Dalam PERKESO', 'Lapuran Wakil Pekerja Dalam KWSP", dll... atau adakah wakil ini yang sudah dilantik tidak lagi memberi lapuran kepada mereka yang mereka wakili (gulungan pekerja), dan pekerja juga tidak memantau wakil mereka... 

Kerana ada perwakilan pekerja - tidak patut kita hanya menyedari sesuatu yang berkaitan hanya bila kerajaan mahu pinda Akta atau polisi....jika ini berlaku wakli pekerja dalam Lembaga Pengarah GAGAL - apa guna ada wakil dalam Lembaga Pengarah yang hanya 'syok sendiri' memanaskan kerusi semasa mesyuarat dan menikmati elaun sebagai Pengarah...

Adakah yang mewakili pihak pekerja lupa bahawa mereka hanya WAKIL - mereka bukan dilantik kerana diri mereka sendiri tetapi sebagai WAKIL...

KWSP pun keadaannya sama --- kenapa Union dan pekerja tidak dimaklumkan mengenai hasrat/perbicangan melewatkan umur pekerja mendapat hak mengeluarkan ... Jika tak ada WAKIL, ada lojik jika Union dan Pekerja 'terperanjat' dan hanya dapat tahu bila kerajaan buat pengumuman atau mengemukan usul pindaan Akta..saperti mahu lewatkan usia bila pekerja ada hak keluarkan wang KWSP?

WAKIL PEKERJA - nampaknya gagal bertindak sebagai wakil > Lebih baik wakil sedemikian dibuang dan wakil baru yang 'transparent dan accountable'...dilantik....

Mungkin, ada yang beri alasan adamacam  'OSA' - dan bahawa mereka tidak boleh dedahkan apa yang berlaku dalam Lembaga Pengarah kepada orang lain. Karut - mereka dilantik bukan secara individu gitu saja > tetapi sebagai 'WAKIL PEKERJA' - dan Dalam PERKESO, sebagai 'WAKIL ORANG BERINSURAN'

Adakah wakil Kementerian Sumber Manusia memberi lapuran dan mendapatkan arahan daripada ketua mereka, kementerian mereka atau Menteri berkenaan? Sememangnya ada - kerana mereka pun hanya 'wakil' ...

Sama juga dengan Pengarah yang menjadi Wakil Pekerja - apa yang berlaku perlu dilapurkan kepada BOS(iaitu Union lain, pekerja) - dan arahan harus diperolehi daripada BOS mengenai pendirian yang akan diambil dalam Lembaga Pengarah - sokong apa, bantah apa, kompromisi mana yang boleh diterima ...

Jika ini kini tidak berlaku, wakil sedia ada bukan sahaja GAGAL - tetapi dalam setengah keadaan mungkin juga boleh dianggap PENDERHAKA...  apabila berlaku pindaan Akta tiba-tiba atau 'polisi' yang mencabul hak pekerja/Union..

BILA sudah bermula perbincangan diperingkat Lembaga Pengarah - pekerja/Union sudah mesti tahu, dan menyertai proses perbincangan melalui wakil mereka dalam Lembaga Pengarah...

Kini kita hanya tahu bila keluar media...dan baru kita mula bertindak??? Tetapi bukankah anih kerana 'wakil' pekerja sudah tahu mengenai isu ini mungkin sudah lama...

Berikut senarai Ahli Lembaga PERKEO - dari Laman PERKESO

Berikut juga sebuah rencana membincangkan seksyen baru seksyen 74a Akta mengenai PERKESO, yang membolehkan PERKESO mengambilalih syarikat - yang mungkin menyebabkan duit PERKESO digunakan untuk 'membantu' syarikat macam 1MDB, dll...yang mengalami masalah.... Bagus untuk pekerja atau tidak?

The new provision of section 74a allows Socso to establish or take over any company, with the approval of Minister of Human Resources and Minister of Finance respectively.




Is Socso's fund still safe with new section 74a?


Mohamed Hanipa Maidin     Published     Updated    


MP SPEAKS | What are the common denominations of public entities such as Employees Provident Fund (EPF), Kumpulan Wang Persaraan (Diperbadankan) (KWAP), Lembaga Tabung Angkatan Tentera (LTAT), Tabung Haji and Social Security Organization (Socso)? Yes, they are part of our social security funds.

Each of these funds is regulated by its own special legislation. Each law was specifically designed in order to ensure the organisation would operate within the specified boundaries which were prescribed for it.

Since the sources of these funds originate from the people, it goes without saying that the money should only be used and utilised for the specified purposes designed for them. In a nutshell, these funds are the trust funds.

It is common knowledge that on many occasions, we have witnessed how these social security funds were arbitrarily used, going beyond the mandated scope, such as bailing out certain ambiguous and dubious businesses.

In a society where the principles of accountability, transparency and trustworthiness is extremely low, the social security funds can become easy prey of ferocious political predators.

We have seen how a sizable chunk of money from EPF, KWAP, LTAT and Tabung Haji were arbitrarily used before in order to bail out some irresponsible elements in the country.

Fortunately, so far, we have not heard of or seen any bailout coming from the Socso's fund. It is everybody's wish and hope, especially the contributors to the fund, that Socso will forever keep on track insofar as the management of the workers' money is concerned.

Worrying amendment

Whether the Socso's huge and valuable assets remain secured and safe is questionable now, given the fact that some controversial amendments have been introduced by BN government to the Employees' Social Security Act 1969 ("Act"). A new section of 74a,which is inserted in the Act, has raised some eyebrows due to its deep impact on the security of the fund.

I don't have the current figures of Socso's assets but according to the Socso annual report of 2014, the value of its current assets (mostly cash) was RM 11 billion and its non current assets stood at RM 11billion. With the new amendments of the Act, all the employees, regardless of their salaries, are obligated to contribute to Socso. Be that as it may, we expect its current assets would be steadily increased manifold.

The new provision of section 74a allows Socso to establish or take over any company, with the approval of Minister of Human Resources and Minister of Finance respectively.

Two days were allocated by Parliament for the debate and ministerial reply respectively on the amendments of the Act. Many Pakatan Harapan members of parliament (MPs) who participated in the debate, I included, strenuously objected to this controversial section of 74a. As expected, BN MPs accepted this section without demur.

Apart from section 74a, many also raised the issue of the removal of Bank Negara's representative from the Socso's panel of investment. The government justified such a removal by using the excuse of conflict of interest. We raised legitimate concerns that such a removal would jeopardise the internal mechanism of checks and balance.

But my focus in this article is more on the new section of 74a. As far as I am concerned, this provision has far reaching repercussions on the survivability and longevity of this social security fund.

Room for misappropriation

Our reason for the objection was very clear. Why should the government drag Socso to do something which it was not designed for in the first place? Why is there a need to derail Socso from its original objectives and statutory functions? What is the underlying rationale stimulating the government to introduce such a mind-boggling provision?

We believe all these questions are legitimate and they demand truthful and honest answers from the government, considering the sizable chunk of money in Socso’s fund.

When I debated, I raised the concerns that this new section would possibly expose the trust money in the Socso fund to a very high risk. Not only that. Section 74a, I contended, would also possibly give room for the misappropriation of such a fund for any undesignated purpose. Using the fund for establishing or taking over any company is definitely outside the purview of Socso’s roles and functions.

In my debate, I queried the minister, "Can you give us the guarantee or assurance that not even a single penny would be taken from the Socso’s fund for the purpose of establishing and running a new company or taking over any existing company?”

Unfortunately, the minister did not answer my question. In fact, many other questions by my colleagues also remained unanswered.

I dare to say that the way minister replied to our questions, he seemed to have lost direction and gone off tangent so much so we had a hard time understanding him, let alone his reasons.

When we asked him what was really the rationale for allowing Socso to establish or take over a company, his reply was, "Socso established a rehab centre in Malacca and I have visited the place. When I looked at the patients therein, my tears fell down."

An irrelevant reply to a fairly simple question. With such a reply, I believe, all the Malaysians have more reasons to be concerned with the future of the Socso's fund.

MOHAMED HANIPA MAIDIN is Sepang MP.

Tuesday, February 16, 2016

101 kumpulan dan kesatuan - Majikan yang harus bayar levi - Tidak moral untuk Malaysia ambil dari pekerja untuk menyelesai masalah ekonomi negara

Joint Statement – 12/2/2016

Employers should pay the Levy – Not Migrant Workers
Immoral for Malaysia to take from Workers to overcome national economic problems

We the 101 undersigned civil society organisations, trade unions and groups are shocked by the news that the Malaysian government is increasing the migrant worker (foreign worker) levy to more than double the current rate, which since January 2013, had to be paid by the migrant workers themselves.  Prior to that, it was paid by the employer of migrant workers, whereby the introduction of the levy then was to deter employers employing migrant workers, rather than local Malaysian workers. This was also stated by the then Malaysian Labour Director-General Datuk Ismail Abdul Rahim who was quoted saying that, “…The rationale behind getting employers to bear the levy was to discourage them from employing foreigners…”  [Star, 16/4/2009]

Migrant Worker Levy Rates Drastically Increased as of 1/2/2016

The Malaysian government recently announced that, as of 1/2/2016, annual levy payable for each migrant worker is increased to RM2,500 (manufacturing, construction and service sectors) and RM1,500 (plantation and agriculture). Before this, the annual levy payable for a Migrant Worker in the Manufacturing sector (RM1,250), Construction sector (RM 1,250), Plantation sector (RM590), Agricultural sector (RM410) and Services sector (RM1,250 – RM1,850) which was so much lower.

This new rates in comparison greatly burden the migrant worker in that the annual levy payable per migrant worker will now be doubled, or even tripled. 

For example, a migrant worker in an electronic factory, classified under the manufacturing sector, who paid a levy of RM1,250 before, will now have to pay double, RM2,500. A worker earning a monthly minimum wage of RM900, which is the wage many migrants are paid, will now have to pay more than RM200 for levy, leaving them with only less than RM700 as their monthly wage, not taking into account all other wage deductions. This is most unjust.

It is unconscionable for the Malaysian government to target migrant workers in the hope of making extra income of RM2.5 billion for the country from the 2.1 million documented migrant workers in Malaysia to rescue Malaysia from its current financial woes.

Easily Exploited With Almost No Access to Justice Makes Migrant Workers Vulnerable to Employers

When Malaysia, introduced Minimum Wage, employers and employer groups complained that their labour cost had gone up, and they could not afford it. In response, the Malaysian government decided that employers no longer need to pay the migrant worker levy, thus the obligation to pay the levy fell on migrant workers themselves.

Contract substitution remains a problem. Migrant workers agree to come to work in Malaysia, but when they start working, the migrant workers complain that they are now paid lower than what they had agreed to in their country of origin with the employer and/or his agent. Many employers have also used the Minimum Wage of RM900, as the standard wages they pay migrant workers. 

Because of the debt incurred by migrant workers in coming to Malaysia to work, which is about RM5,000 and the practice of employers and/or agents holding on to their passports and work permits, migrant workers find themselves in a form of bonded labour, and not able to do anything else but just survive. 

With the very low wages, they receive; many are forced into doing overtime sometimes 4 hours per day, working on rest days and even public holidays to make ends meet. Malaysian law stipulates a draconian overtime limit of 104 hours every month. This means, in effect migrant workers can be forced to work for 12 hours a day because in many workplaces doing overtime is no longer an option that workers can refuse. As such, migrant workers and even local workers can be considered to be engaged in some form of ‘forced labour’.

For migrant workers, access to justice remains a myth for many. When they complain about rights violations, what happens in many cases is that they are terminated, and their permit to work and/or remain in Malaysia is also terminated. This causes migrant workers to be easily controlled and exploited cheaply. They do not even have the option to claim justice.

Employers Contribute Less to Migrant Workers Income

Under the Malaysian law, employers are required to contribute 13% of the monthly income, inclusive of overtime earnings, to the Employees Provident Fund, this requirement is not applicable to the migrant workers. This makes migrant workers cheaper.

Further, since many employers do not take in migrant workers directly as their own employees, but take and use them as workers who are supplied by the labour suppliers - legally known as the contractors for labour - it effectively prevents these supplied migrant workers the right to join in-house trade unions. Even if they do join national/regional unions, they simply will not be able to enjoy the extra rights and benefits that come by reason of a Collective Bargaining Agreement between Union and Employer, simply by reason that they are not recognised as employees. Calls for the abolition of the ‘contractor for labour system’ by trade unions and civil society have gone unheeded by the government. 

Malaysia recognizes that households earning less than RM4,000 a month requires financial assistance, and local workers do get a small assistance from the government through the BR1M program – but migrant workers are excluded from this benefit.

Weakening Ringgit Causes Migrants to earn 20-40% less.

Whilst, the financial problems Malaysia is facing, coupled with the increased cost of living - new taxes, increased transportation costs, and the weakening of the Malaysian Ringgit in relation to currency of the country of origins of migrants – it is the migrant worker who suffers the most. 

The weakening ringgit also means that the money migrant workers send back home to their families is now much less and this has a serious impact on their families/dependents and the ability to settle their debts back home. It was recently reported, that "For instance, employees from Bangladesh used to make 44 taka for every RM1, but now it is about 17 taka. The drop is very drastic, more than 40%."Even the ringgit to the Indonesian rupiah has seen a drop in value by 20%," (Malaysian Insider, 5/2/2016)

Unjust to impose New Financial Obligations On Migrant Workers Already In Malaysia

It is totally unjust for Malaysia to impose new financial obligations by law on migrant workers, which did not exist when they agreed with their employers to come and work in Malaysia for 3-5 years. Any new obligations especially of payment by migrant workers should only apply to new migrant workers who have yet to agree to come to Malaysia to work – certainly not to those who are already here and working.

The Malaysian Trade Union Congress(MTUC) and employer groups have been informed that employers will now have to  pay migrant worker levy. This was also mentioned in a media report, which stated, ‘The FMM[Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers] said the government recently informed employers that the levy burden would be shifted back to them. (Star, 2/2/2016).

However, employer groups have started a campaign lobbying the Malaysian government to re-consider, and the Malaysian government has been reported as saying that they may re-consider. There is concern that this re-consideration may not just be about the amount of levy payable, but also the question as to who will have to pay the levy – migrant workers or their employer?

Therefore, we the undersigned

Call on the Malaysian government in the name of justice, to ensure that it must be the employers of migrant workers that should be paying this Migrant Worker levy – not the migrant workers;

Call on the Malaysian government to also reconsider the increase of the levy rate, at this time whilst Malaysia, and especially small Malaysian businesses, are affected by the economic crisis and the effect of the falling Malaysian ringgit.

Call on the Malaysian government to increase the Minimum Wage of all workers in Malaysia to RM1,200 – RM1,500, to compensate for the increased cost of living in Malaysia, and the falling value of the Malaysian ringgit with  reference to the currency in migrant worker’s countries of origin. 

Call on the Malaysian government to abolish the ‘contractor for labour’ system, and ensure that all workers that are working in a workplace are all recognised employees of the said workplace, and are treated equally as workers.



Charles Hector
Mohd Roszeli bin Majid
Pranom Somwong

For and on behalf of the 101 organisations, trade unions and groups listed below 

ALIRAN
Alternative ASEAN Network on Burma (ALTSEAN-Burma)
Asia Monitor Resource Centre(AMRC)
Asia Floor Wage Alliance
Asia Pacific Forum on Women Law and Development (APWLD)
Association of Human Rights Defenders and Promoters- Myanmar
Asociación de trabajadoras del Hogar a Domicilio y de Maquila, ATRAHDOM, Guatemala, Centro Amercia. 
Bangladesh Groep Nederland (Bangladesh Group The Netherlands)
Bangladesh Institute of Labour Studies- BILS
BLAST,  Bangladesh
Boat People SOS (BPSOS)
Building and Wood Workers International (BWI) Asia Pacific Region
Campagna Abiti Puliti – Italy
CARAM Asia
Clean Clothes Campaign International Office(CCC)
Club Employees Union Peninsular Malaysia(CEUPM)
Coalition to Abolish Modern-day Slavery in Asia (CAMSA)
Crispin B. Beltran Resource Center (CBBRC),Philippines
CWI Malaysia (Committee for Workers International)
Defend Job Philippines
Fair – Italy
FAIR ACTION, Sweden
Foundation For Women, Thailand 
Garment and Allied Workers Union, India
German Clean Clothes Campaign
Homeworkers Worldwide, United Kingdom
IDEAL (Institute for Development of Alternative Living
IndustriALL Bangladesh Council (IBC)
Institut Rakyat
International Labor Rights Forum
Jaringan Rakyat Tertindas (JERIT)
Jatio Shromik Federation (JSF), Bangladesh
Karmojibi Nari (KN), Bangladesh
Kesatuan Pekerja-Pekerja Perodua
Kesatuan Sekerja Industri Elektronik Wilayah Selatan, Semenanjung Malaysia (KSIEWSSM)
Knowledge and Rights with Young people through Safer Spaces (KRYSS)
Labour Behind the Label
Labour Studies and Action Centre (CEREAL), Mexico
Legal support for Children and Women (LSCW), Cambodia
MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)
Malaysian Election Observers Network
Malaysian Trades Union Congress (MTUC)
MAP Foundation (Thailand)
MHS Aviation Employees Union
Migrante International
Mission for Migrant Workers
Myanmar Migrants Rights Centre
NAMM (Network of Action for Migrants in Malaysia)
National Garment Workers Federation (NGWF), Bangladesh
National Union Employees in Companies Manufacturing Rubber Products (NUECMRP)
National Union of Transport Equipment & Allied Industries Workers (NUTEAW), Malaysia
NLD LA Malaysia
North South Initiative
Oriental Hearts and Mind Study Institute(OHMSI)
Panggau Sarawak
Paper Products Manufacturing Employees’ Union of Malaysia (PPMEU)
Parti Rakyat Malaysia(PRM)
Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM)
Pax Romana ICMICA
Peoples Service Organisation (PSO)
Persatuan Sahabat Wanita Selangor (PSWS)
Pertubuhan Angkatan Bahaman, Temerloh, Pahang, Malaysia
PROHAM -Persatuan Promosi Hak Asasi Manusia
Radanar Ayar Rural Development Association, Myanmar
Repórter Brasil
Safety and Rights Society, Bangladesh
Sahabat Rakyat
Schone Kleren Campagne (CCC Netherlands)
SEA Women's Caucus on ASEAN
Solidarity of Cavite Workers (SCW), Philippines
Sramik Nirapotta Forum, Bangladesh
SUARAM
Tenaga National Berhad Junior Officers Union (TNBJOU)
TENAGANITA Women’s Force, Malaysia
Textile Clothing and Footwear Union of Australia
The Collectif Ethique sur létiquette, Clean Clothes Campaign French
Think Centre, Singapore
UNI Global Union
War on Want
WARBE Development Foundation, Bangladesh
WH4C (Workers Hub For Change)
Women Peace Network-Arakan, Myanmar
Women Rehabilitation Center (WOREC), Nepal
Workers Assistance Center, Inc (WAC) , Philippines
Vietnamese Women for Human Rights
Yaung Chi Oo Workers Association-YCOWA
Yayasan Lintas Nusa, Indonesia
IMA Research Foundation, Bangladesh
International Trade Union Confederation(ITUC)
Women's Aid Organisation(WAO), Malaysia
PINAY (The Filipino Women's Organization in Quebec), Canada
Cividep India
Kesatuan Sekerja Industri Elektronik Wilayah Utara Semenanjung Malaysia
Centro Nuovo Modello di Sviluppo – Italy
National Union of Flight Attendants Malaysia (NUFAM)
Pusat KOMAS
Perak Women for Women Society (PWW)
Asian Migrant Centre
Center for Alliance of Labor and Human Rights (CENTRAL)-Cambodia
Labour Education and Service Network
Mekong Migration Network(MMN)

Media coverage:- 

Employers should pay foreign worker levy, say civil society groups (Malaysian Insider)

'IMMORAL' MALAYSIA GETS A TICKING OFF: Bosses should pay the levy – NOT the migrant workers (Malaysia Chronicle, 13/2/2016))

Employers should pay the levy, not migrant workers (Malaysiakini, 12/2/2016)

 

The said Joint Statement was send to the Prime Minister of Malaysia, Minister of Human Resources, Minister of Home Affair (who is in charge of the Immigration Department), Opposition Leader in Parliament and SUHAKAM(Malaysia's Human Rights Commission). The emailed copy can be seen at ...

101 Groups Letter to PM Najib - Employers should pay the Levy – Not Migrant Workers , Immoral for Malaysia to take from Workers to overcome national economic problems